• The big day had finally arrived. We were at last on our way to discover “Britain’s Greatest Palace.” My travel buddy, Ian, and I were on the top deck of a bus leaving Oxford for Woodstock and Blenheim. Our expectations were high. A guide at another stately home in the north had raved about Blenheim, saying it was the most splendid building he had ever visited. The Rough Guide to England describes it as “England’s finest example of Baroque civic architecture.” It was all set up to be an amazing day.

    However, as we travelled through the Oxfordshire countryside, I harboured my doubts. Was it really going to be that great? Afterall, I was born and bred in Derbyshire. Everyone in that neck of the woods knows that Chatsworth is the greatest stately home in the country, no argument, and that is not even mentioning Haddon Hall and Hardwick Hall in the same county. Together they form a magnificent trio. I am prejudiced I know but I was more than a bit cynical about Blenheim’s grandiose claims.

    Ian and I had debated long and hard about whether to even go to Blenheim on a day trip from Oxford . The admission price was an eye-watering £41 each with no concessions for OAPs. It had better be good we muttered as we took a deep breath and paid up. We had been advised to book in advance because of the Palace’s immense popularity. As well as being the great architect, John Vanbrugh’s masterpiece, it had also been the birthplace and home of one of Britain’s most famous leaders, Winston Churchill, so it was bound to attract lots of people.

    After half an hour or so the bus approached Woodstock. The stop before the town centre was actually right beside the large, ornate, wrought iron gates of the palace. We disembarked, showed our tickets and headed up a dead straight avenue to an elaborate stone gateway. Beyond this was the great palace itself. The gateway led into a courtyard surrounded by old stone buildings. It was the usual set up. The stables or whatever had been converted into visitor facilities — a cafe/restaurant, toilets and the inevitably priced -up shop. We were in need of a rest and a drink after the journey and so headed straight for the cafe. Incongruously there was modern pop music playing in the background. We had encountered the same thing at Christ Church College shop back in Oxford. Nobody seemed to have thought it important to create an appropriate atmosphere for the exploration of an early 18th century building.

    As we rested and sipped our drinks, we looked forward to our exploration of this special monument, a Grade 1 listed building and a World Heritage Site. Like good, conscientious cultural tourists we had researched the history of the place. The story began in 1704 when John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, led an army that defeated Louis XIV’s French and their Bavarian allies at Blenheim, an Austrian village on the River Danube. It was part of the War of the Spanish Succession, where the British were trying to stop the French from controlling Spain. Like much of history, it’s terribly complicated and led to countless tragic deaths. Anyway, Churchill defeated the previously formidable French army and Queen Anne rewarded him with the Royal estate of Woodstock, along with the promise of enough cash to build a gigantic, celebratory palace.

    Work started promptly in 1705 with Sir John Vanbrugh as the principal architect assisted by Nicholas Hawksmoor, a talented protegee of Sir Christopher Wren. Vanbrugh had first made his name as a playwright, creating several Restoration comedies which were scathing and controversial satires on English society at the time. He was also heavily involved in politics and took part in the plotting to replace the Catholic King James II with his protestant daughter Mary and Dutch son in law, William, in 1688. ( known as the “Glorious Revolution.”)

    When Vanbrugh switched to architecture, he had no training or qualifications but he did have a brilliant imagination and an unerring eye for perspective and detail. Assisted by Hawksmoor and a team of skilled craftsmen, he created an English version of Baroque architecture, the fancy, decorative style popular in Italy and France and across Europe. His first big success was Castle Howard in North Yorkshire. On the basis of this, Vanbrugh got the commission to design what was to be Blenheim Palace. The architect of Chatsworth House,( the first Baroque country house in England), William Tulman, also applied, but Vanbrugh probably got the commission because he was a smooth talker, moved in high circles and knew the Duke through the Kit Kat gentlemen’s club in London.

    Vanbrugh’s vision for Blenheim was to create a national monument to celebrate the Duke of Marlborough’s famous victory. It was going to be more than a family home. This soon led him to clash with the Duke’s strong-willed wife, Sarah Jennings. Her wish was for a cosy, middle class family home not some grandiose edifice. She had also wanted Sir Christopher Wren to do the job but perhaps he wasn’t one of the Duke’s mates at the Kit Kat Club. Who knows? The Duchess and the architect were constantly at loggerheads, and in the end, Vanbrugh walked off the job in disgust in 1716, vowing never to return. Further delays were caused by John Churchill’s involvement in political infighting and at one point, he was even banished to France for 3 years. After his great military triumph, he didn’t seem to want to rest on his laurels and settle for the quiet life.

    The upshot of all this is that construction stopped for years, and Queen Anne lost interest in financing the expensive project. The palace was only finally finished after the Duke died. It was mostly paid for by his widow Sarah and she hired Hawksmoor to complete the task as Vanbrugh was still sulking elsewhere. It was finally finished in 1722, seventeen years after the building had begun. By then Queen Anne had passed away as well and Britain had entered the age of the Georgians.

    Blenheim became England’s largest non-Royal domestic building. It is built of pale mellow, yellow stone ( apologies to Donovan.) It consists of 3 main blocks. The centre contains both living and magnificent state rooms, inspired by Versailles. Then there are 2 large rectangular wings, both surrounding a courtyard. In the cafe, draining our Americanos, we were sitting in one of these wings. The main dazzling show was still to come. We looked forward to seeing the tall slender windows and monumental statuary on the roofs. On the inside we would see the 20 metre ( 67 ft) Great Hall and a huge, frescoed Saloon. As we left the palace tearoom, our appetites were well and truly whetted….

    But, as you may have guessed already, we were going to be severely disappointed. As we approached the main entrance to the famous palace we came across a notice thanking us for our contribution to the major restoration work that was currently being carried out. We rounded a corner and found that the whole central section of the magnificent south portico was completely hidden behind scaffolding and protective sheeting! It was a massive shock and anti-climax. We stood there for a couple of minutes in complete disbelief! We had paid all that money to look at a flapping wall of white plastic!

    So we just had to imagine the spectacular array or piers and classical columns, and the huge bust of the “Sun King” on the roof, being forced to look down on the splendours and rewards of his conqueror. The best consolation they could offer us was a large postcard of the magnificent frontage in the shop, or maybe we could have bought a jig saw. The whole situation was like a big, sick joke. Surely they should have warned us about the restoration work before letting us shell out all that money? Either that, or they could have significantly reduced the very steep entrance price.

    However, we just had to lick our wounds and get on with it. We entered the building, showed our tickets again and followed the trail. To be fair, the interior is stuffed with high class paintings, tapestries and objects d’art. There is furniture from Versailles to rub the salt into the wounds of the defeated French and superb carvings by Grinling Gibbons, who had managed to stay on the right side of Duchess Sarah. We saw a great painting by Singer Sergeant and two by Anthony Van Dyck, which were strangely not clearly labelled or explained. The attendants were good but there were too few of them such that not every room could be covered. We came across a room full of paintings by Sir Winston Churchill which were being proudly displayed. However they were just so-so. He might have been a formidable war leader but he was strictly an amateur artist.

    We came to the Saloon which has an apparently breath-taking, frescoed dome, but this too was hidden behind scaffolding and sheeting. Earlier we had been unable to see a famous painted ceiling in the entrance hall. We had to swallow our disappointments. I couldn’t however help blurting out to Ian, that Chatsworth was 10 times better than this! At this point we bumped into 2 Americans who we had met in the hotel breakfast room back in Oxford. They were “doing” stately houses of England and had mainly come to Oxford to visit Blenheim. What a disappointment for them. I later learnt that the work has been going on for 2 years and still has at least another year to go. I don’t suppose they’ll be rushing back from Texas to see it once it finally reopens in all its glory. We recommended a lesser known Vanbrugh building — Seaton Delaval Hall– for them to possibly visit when they made it up to the north east. They seemed interested.

    Our tour of the state rooms and private living quarters on the first floor didn’t really take that long and before we knew it we were back in the formal garden that sits in front of the entrance. Obviously, it being September, the garden was somewhat passed its peak. We admired the views down to a lake and an extensive park, landscaped inevitably by Lancelot Capability Brown. Across a narrow part of the lake was Vanbrugh’s Grand Bridge. Then the parkland swept up a hill, topped by the Column of Victory featuring an heroic statue of the 1st Duke of Marlborough, John Churchill. I wonder what French visitors make of all this over -the- top British triumphalism?

    We were just about to stride out to explore the park when the dark clouds overhead turned into persistent cold rain. Our disappointing day was continuing! We dived back into the palace for shelter and ended up on the ground floor. Here we saw all the usual upstairs-downstairs stuff in quite a good exhibition. We saw the kitchen, the servants quarters and a table laden with pretend food being prepared for the aristocrats above. A lady dressed as a Victorian chambermaid gave us an interesting, little talk. Apparently the palace had fallen into disrepair by the end of the 19th century and was only saved by funds from the 9th Duke’s marriage to the American railroad heiress, Consuelo Vanderbilt. It was a loveless marriage of convenience. He got the money and she got the title.

    We went on to view the exhibition about Winston Churchill, the revered war leader who was born and brought up at Blenheim. He was given a grand state funeral when he died in 1965 and I remember it being on the black and white telly most of that day with commentary by Richard Dimbleby in his sonorous tones. I don’t subscribe to the Churchill cult. Neither did my mum who described him as a “war monger.” It’s strange to me that he is regarded as one of Britain’s greatest statesmen. First of all he was half American, as his mother, Jennie, Lady Randolph Churchill came from across the pond. It was the same deal as above — money for a title. Also I note that Winston Churchill ordered striking Welsh miners to be shot, when he was Home Secretary in 1910. In the First World War he was responsible for the disastrous Dardanelles Campaign in Turkey that led to many needless deaths. In the 1920s as Chancellor he put Britain back on the Gold Standard, causing economic hardship for many and leading to social unrest culminating in the 1926 General Strike. In the same decade he threatened to gas rebellious Kurds in British run Iraq. ( Thankfully he didn’t carry out his chilling threat.) Even in the Second World War, when he was Britain’s great leader, he was the architect of the failed Narvik campaign which tried to secure northern Norway from German occupation. General Dwight D Eisenhower was reputed to have remarked that the allies won the second world war DESPITE not BECAUSE of Churchill. I won’t continue with the hatchet job. Suffice to say — I am not a Churchill fan.

    When we came out of the house a second time it had stopped raining so this time we were able to descend into the park towards the lake. From Vanbrugh’s bridge we watching cormorants and grebes diving and fishing. We also saw a couple of young visitors go down from the bridge to the waterside and take a selfie in front of an unusually shaped tree protected by a low fence. When we checked it out we found from an information board that this tree had featured in a Harry Potter film and was now visited by hundreds of fans every year. There seemed to be no getting away from the fictitious boy wizard in this part of England.

    Finally we strolled out of the park and exited via another gateway into the little town of Woodstock. It was now late afternoon and very quiet. The town is picturesque, having quite a few historical buildings. I spoke to a lady in an oriental rug shop that I visited about the repair work at the palace. It seemed the roof was leaking in places and priceless frescoes were in danger of being destroyed for ever. So the urgent renovation work is understandable but she agreed with me that visitors should be warned. There seemed to be an uneasy relationship between the palace and the town. The rug lady told me that there were plans to chop down a bluebell wood and destroy other countryside owned by the palace in order to install one of the largest solar farms in Europe. Many town’s folk were up in arms.

    We enjoyed Woodstock, especially as we didn’t have to pay £41 to see it. We admired the old buildings and then went to sit in a peaceful, beautiful churchyard as some late afternoon sun at last came out. It was a magical half hour or so.

    Finally we enjoyed an excellent Italian meal at a local bistro, before catching the bus back to Oxford. It had been a very interesting day and we had really enjoyed it. However, as the bus passed Blenheim’s grand gates and we glanced again up the avenue to the scaffolding covered Baroque towers, we couldn’t help thinking that we had been cheated by the descendants of Churchill. They should have told us! Lastly, if anyone of you out there wants to enjoy the greatest house in England, get yourself to Derbyshire and visit Chatsworth!

    NB To locate my earlier posts, please go to : https://scrapheapstuart2.wordpress.com

  • For the last 15 years or so I have been blogging. In other words I have been writing down my thoughts about various subjects on the internet and, incredibly, people from all over the world have read them. I say “incredibly” because for over half my life the internet didn’t exist. The thought of exchanging views with a stranger in America, Italy or Singapore would have seemed like something out of the wildest realms of science fiction. Even H G Wells didn’t think up that one. I never became a “vlogger” or an “influencer”, but I’m very happy expressing myself through blogs.

    I am now 75 years old and have a birthday in only a few weeks time. Most people would describe me as “elderly.” The internet has been a pretty steep leaning curve for me. I used to be a school teacher, retiring in 2006 when I was approaching 57. Computer skills were fast becoming a necessity in the teaching profession , and, towards the end, I was starting to struggle. The chalk and talk days of the blackboard were fading into distant memory and I missed them. In other words I was becoming a bit of a dinosaur. In my last job at a tough, little middle school in Blyth, Northumberland, most classrooms had been adapted to have interactive whiteboards. They looked pretty incongruous in what was still an old, red-brick Victorian building. I was issued with a laptop and was encouraged to type my lesson plans on there. Stuff like: headings, diagrams, maps and pictures would then magically appear on the whiteboard in the classroom, to stimulate the interest of the pupils. In the past, I used to draw them in different coloured chalks. I taught history and geography and used to pride myself on being able to draw a map of the British Isles in 30 seconds or one of the whole world in 2 minutes. Together with another “stick in the mud” geography teacher, I continued to write on the board, but by now it was a white board and I wrote with pungent smelling felt pens. Some kids used to sit on the front row just to get a whiff of them. If the room had an interactive white board, I had to rely on help from the pupils to do my “virtual” writing with a pretend pen. They loved helping me but it was all a bit embarrassing.

    Anyway I retired. I managed to cling on for the last few of my 35 years in schools without becoming fully computer literate. I also remarried and one of the first things my new wife and I purchased together was a desk-top computer, advised by the IT teacher at my old school. It sat there in the spare room and I circled it warily, trying to pluck up courage to learn how to use it. Gradually I got into emails and word-processing. Then I learnt how to Google to find out things.( My encyclopaedias became obsolete overnight.) At the time in 2006-7 this was all new to me. It was almost as if I had regressed into being a little child again.

    My next foray was into social media which I know has become a hot topic of conversation today. Back in the noughties Facebook was the big thing. People left behind “Friends Reunited” and migrated to Facebook to get in touch with friends and acquaintances on a more regular basis. The adverts exhorted us to stay connected. ( they still do).Today it’s regarded as mostly an old people’s thing but back then it was very popular with all ages. The spur came when my wife’s daughter had a holiday in New Zealand and then told us all the photos were on Facebook. At first this meant we couldn’t see them. We were locked out. So I decided to enter this brave new world and join the party. One day I took the big step and registered and started to find my way around the site. We eventually saw the NZ photos and congratulated ourselves that we had caught up with the latest trend and we weren’t missing out.

    I enjoyed being on Facebook and still do to a certain extent. It keeps me in touch with a whole range of people. I have swapped photos, news, ideas and recommendations. However, after a while I started to get fed with all the trivia on there — the selfies and photos of people’s breakfasts. Thus it was that after a visit to the Whitworth Art Gallery in Manchester, I decided to raise the level of discourse a bit by putting up a review of a William Blake exhibition I had just enjoyed. I thought it would make a change from looking at someone’s new haircut or what they had just eaten for dinner. Of course it went down like a lead balloon! Nobody seemed to care whether I liked William Blake or not. However, against the odds, it did lead to something significant. My daughter, Catherine saw it and suggested that I might like writing a blog. She suggested WordPress.com and a friend of hers kindly helped me set up my site. All I needed was a good name.

    The idea came when I was walking with a friend F and his wife, M. It was only a couple of months since I had retired and M asked me if I had been back to the school to see my former colleagues. I said I hadn’t and then commented that it had often been awkward when people came back and I didn’t have any time to talk to them. M then came out with the classic sentence: ” I know, and who wants to speak to somebody on the scrapheap anyway?” I was taken aback! Considering I had just retired myself, I thought it unbearably crass and rude to refer to people in that way. Needless to say, the conversation didn’t continue. But every cloud has a silver lining. Out of this moment of acute embarrassment came my blogging name : scrapheapstuart . I decided to call my blog — “Tales from the Scrapheap.” Also, I decided I wanted the blog to show that life doesn’t end when one retires. Unlike M, I didn’t define my life through my job. In fact, retirement is not just an end; it is also a new beginning. Corny I know, but true.

    Therefore my blogging journey began, somewhere back in 2007. I chose a username and password and I was off. I planned to write essays about my life — my thoughts on current affairs, looking back on my past through memoir pieces and describing my travels and interests. My first blog was basically introducing myself. It was an exciting moment when it first went out “live” into the world, and even more exciting when someone actually read it. The site told me how many hits I had had and what countries they came from. I had always been in the top 3 for English at school and got an A grade at GCE A Level so I was pretty confident that I could string a few sentences together in a coherent manner. However, my blogging career almost ground to a halt before it began..

    When I tried to get on to the wordpress site to write my second essay, I was confronted with the dreaded words: “incorrect password.” I thought I had written it down carefully but the wordpress algorithm wouldn’t let me back in. It was immensely frustrating. In the end I joined wordpress again calling myself scrapheapstuart2. I had to open a new email account in order to do this as the computer kept telling me there was already a site connected to my normal email address. At this moment, please imagine me screaming at the machine and trying to tear my hair out! Once I got in under my new name and password, I wrote a furious piece — “Who’s in Charge – Them or Us?” By “them” I was referring to machines. Today the answer to the question is easy — it’s them, the machines that are ruling our world. Artificial Intelligence is invading most aspects of life and stopping us humans from doing our own thinking. I have friends who rely on Alexa to do all sorts of things, from answering questions, to playing music, to switching on and dimming the lights. But I won’t go on.

    I later figured out why the machine was right and I was wrong, which is always the case of course. In my original blog name I had accidently missed out the “r” and ended up calling myself “scapheapstuart.” Somewhere out there in the ether there is a sole blog in that name. It’s weird to think it will outlive me but I cannot even remember how to get into it.

    Thus began an important new part of my life. All my holidays now had 5 parts — 1. Planning. 2 Going on the actual holiday. 3. Taking photos. 4. Compiling a picture book. 5. Researching and writing a blog. After taking advice from my journalist step-daughter, I always tried to give my blogs an angle rather than merely describing or explaining something. As I suggested to my English students at school, rhetorical questions are always a good ploy to draw readers in. Another way of attracting readers is to have a good title. One of my early travel blogs about a trip to Albania was titled “Don’t gulp you raki.” On arriving at a hotel after an exciting trip through the mountains on the border with Greece, the hotel owner gave the taxi driver and us a glass of raki, the local firewater. Stupidly I started to gulp mine down but was quickly put right by the Albanians who told me in sign language that it should be slowly sipped and savoured.

    Another popular blog which had scores of hits in my scrapheapstuart2 days was “Lovely Little Dirty Darren.” This shows the value of a good title. It was actually about a visit to Darwen, the old East Lancs mill town which Chris ( my wife) and I included on our “Hills and Mills” bus -pass trip. Darren is actually the local pronunciation of Darwen. In the church there I spotted an affectionate poem to the town on a stained glass window. Thinking back to its industrial revolution hey day, the poem finished with the line : “Lovely Little Dirty Darren.” There might be lots of people out there who are interested in Darwen but I think the real reason for this blog’s popularity is because some people were expecting a smutty tale along the lines of “Confessions of a Window Cleaner.” I wonder how many read on beyond the first paragraph.

    All went well for 15 years. I attracted readers from all 5 continents and got some kind, encouraging comments. I picked up 91 followers along the way, including a couple from the USA . I only have ever got one negative comment. I had been criticising soap operas and reality TV programmes. The comment was : ” Some people watch rubbish, while some people write rubbish.” One fault of mine is that I can get quite judgemental and opinionated so this feedback was perhaps deserved. On the other hand, it was my blog and nobody can categorically say my opinion is wrong. On a few occasions I wrote eulogies for lost loved ones including my own mum and dad. The writing gave me an important emotional outlet.

    So I blogged quite happily for the best part of 15 years. Every time I went on to my free WordPress site it kindly put in my username and password automatically. It was easy. Until, that is, a morning in August, 2025, only a few weeks ago. After checking my emails I decided to quickly look at my wordpress stats to see if I had had any readers or comments. Unusually the site asked for my password. When I put in what I was sure the password was, it told me, in red lettering “incorrect password.” I did this a few times and then decided to go through the forgotten password procedure. I was sent an email , which included a link to reset my password. I followed the instructions and chose another secret word, but when I went back into the wordpress site , I was told that my newly approved password was still incorrect. This happened 5 times with the same frustrating result. I was locked out of my own blogging site by an algorithm!

    I tried emailing the help section of WordPress about the problem. Someone introduced themselves and said a member of their “Happiness Team” would get back to me in 24 hours. Well it took 48 hours to get a response and then I just got sent on the same fruitless forgotten password loop. I tried all sorts — going into settings and security but I got nowhere. I found out that if you have a free wordpress site ( paid for by adverts) then the only help available is from an AI bot!

    Then, as if my situation wasn’t bad enough, a truly bizarre thing happened. WordPress A I changed my user name from scrapheapstuart2 to — wait for it — joyfuldonutf881a2b165-kitwe.wordpress.com Such a strange name could only be made up by a bot. So I left the scrapheap after 15 years and turned into a happy donut. You couldn’t make it up! I kept on trying and trying to retrieve my old site but now I was doubly locked out. Both my username and password were different to what I had thought they should be.

    I thought about starting up writing with another free blogging site, but the joining process was a bit drawn out and I lost heart. Then I had the idea to give up blogging altogether and draw a line under the whole sorry saga. I would look back on it as just a phase I went through. I felt really down though as I had really enjoyed expressing myself in writing and getting stuff off my chest. As a last resort I decided to try and create a password for the new joyfuldonut site. To my great surprise, it actually let me do this. The machine had at last taken pity on me. I got a welcome from wordpress as if I was a new member. It invited me to write my first piece. I went along with this and wrote about a recent city break in Oxford with a mate. It felt good to be tapping the keys on the laptop again after all that frustration. When I had finished I published it and it went “live”! What an exciting moment it was for me although I don’t know if anyone out there in the world at large even noticed. By another small miracle I managed to share the blog on to my facebook page. I was up and running.

    I sent my new convoluted blogging address to a couple of close friends, asking them to try it out. The first to respond said the link had not worked, so I was thrown back into the dumps again. However, to my great surprise and delight, the second friend said it had worked and he actually went on to read the Oxford piece. It turns out I had carelessly given the first friend an incorrect link. I had missed out a number. I then tried again and missed out a letter! Why is it such a long, stupid address? I had a little rant again! But 3rd time lucky, my friend at last succeeded in accessing the blog at his 3rd attempt. He had been very patient with me. This episode taught me how priceless real friends are — they help you when you are in trouble.

    This is my second full blog under the new donut address. Thanks for reading it. Soon, following advice from one of my more IT savvy friends, I will attempt to link my new blogging site with my old one. Wish me luck. Then finally the happy donut can sit proudly on top of the scrapheap and I can hold my head up high and describe myself once again as an “international blogger.”

    NB To locate my old blogs, go to :https://scrapheapstuart2.wordpress.com

  • WHY OXFORD?

    I’ve just been to Oxford. I know that’s not very original and not much to shout about. It’s on every bucket listers hit list when they are “doing” England. However, I had 3 really good reasons for going there : 1. My travel buddy, Ian, has never been. 2. It’s a fantastic city break destination. 3. It’s not Cambridge…. Let me explain.

    Don’t get me wrong — Cambridge too is fabulous. In fact my Rough Guide informs me that Oxford and Cambridge are “arguably the two most beautiful seats of learning in the world.” The thing is, my wife spent her formative years in Cambridge, still has friends and family there and so we have been on numerous occasions. In fact we had a very enjoyable visit there earlier this year. So, to put it simply, I fancied a change. Ian was easy as he’d not been to either of these venerable university cities. Predictably, as soon as I told my wife Chris, she immediately responded with “Why don’t you go to Cambridge?” She’s prejudiced as she quite understandably loves the place. But I stuck to my guns and chose Oxford. It meant we could also visit Blenheim Palace and dip our toes into the Cotswolds.

    JOURNEY and ARRIVAL.

    After a day of mis-adventures on the trains — “We’re sorry that your journey will take longer than planned” — we arrived late in the afternoon of September 1st. A quick electric bus trip took us north up the Banbury Road and delivered us to our hotel in a plush area of leafy avenues and grand Victorian mansions. Both coming from the relatively deprived north east of England, we were immediately bopped firmly on the nose by the North-South divide.

    That evening, after getting over the shock that the hotel had no hot water ( it’s boiler had expired), we ate a nice Italian meal in the city centre and then had a stroll around as dusk fell and the floodlights flickered on. The centre of old Oxford is an architectural tour de force. What’s more, at 8pm, we virtually had it to ourselves. The day trippers had all gone away. It was like walking into an atmospheric film set. We wondered through a stunning wonderland of Gothic, Jacobean and neo-Classical statement buildings. We strolled from Sir Christopher Wren’s, 17th century, Sheldonian Theatre, into the ornate Old Schools Quadrangle from 1619, and on to the mighty rotunda of the Radcliffe Camera ( 1734-45) which looks as if it’s just been beamed in from ancient Rome.

    Going back to the Sheldonian, it is Oxford University’s main ceremonial hall where degrees are formally dished out and so on. It’s Grade 1 listed. It was Wren’s first major work. It’s a grand rectangular building at the front and gracefully semi-circular at the back. Wren based it on the Theatre of Marcellus in Rome. It’s roof is topped by a white tower with a light green cupola.

    The Bodleian Library next door to the Sheldonian, stands in the Old Schools Quadrangle. It is a beautifully proportioned, ornate quad in Jacobean-Gothic style. Within it there is access to all the university’s academic schools, their titles written in gold letters above the doorways that ring the quad. At one end is a tower featuring all the different types of classical columns. . At the other end , slightly incongruously, stands a statue of the great Flemish artist, Peter Paul Rubens, wearing full 17th century military armour. Nicholas Hawksmoor designed the Clarendon Building which houses the library. He was Wren’s talented protegee. The Bodleian is the UK’s second largest library, after the British Library in London, and is reputed to have 117 miles of shelving!

    The Radcliffe Camera, the 3rd building we saw in this magical ensemble, was designed by James Gibbs. It was the result of King William III’s physician, Dr John Radcliffe, giving mounds of money to construct a library and secure his legacy. It is another Italian design as Gibbs trained in Rome. He created a huge Baroque, circular concoction of limestone columns, a delicate balustrade decorated with urns and an enormous dome.

    Ian and I stared at it in awe for a while. It stands in quiet, pedestrianised Radcliffe Square. On one side of the square are the ancient walls, towers and pinnacles of All Souls College. We peeped through its elaborate, wrought iron gates into a picturesque, floodlit quad. Meanwhile at the bottom of the square is the 15th century Church of St Mary with a soaring tower.

    It was all quite mesmerising and we were in a kind of swoon. However, we were quickly brought down to earth when we decided to have a glance into the town’s covered market and found rough sleepers blocking every entrance. We were reminded that Oxford is not all about gowns and mortar boards and the rarefied world of academia. With this sobering thought we completed our first day amongst the “dreaming spires” and returned to our boiler-less lodgings. It was back to reality with a bite. We drifted off to sleep, remembering the age of flannels and strip washes and dreaming of hot, steamy water. Maybe tomorrow?

    CHRIST CHURCH COLLEGE.

    After a good breakfast at the hotel ( but still no shower) we walked into Oxford down the Banbury Road. It started to lightly rain but it soon cleared. We were amazed by all the enormous mansions and villas, some of them converted into private schools or university departments. Many had fancy porticos, stained glass windows, and large, Tudor -style chimney stacks. We entered the centre via the Martyrs memorial. This commemorates the burning at the stake in 1555 and 1556, of Bishops Ridley, Latimer and Cranmer because they refused to succumb to Queen Mary I’s orders and join the Catholic faith. No wonder she was nicknamed “Bloody Mary.”

    We walked on to Christchurch College. It is Oxford’s largest and most famous college. We were guided to it by Sir Christopher Wren’s striking Tom Tower which was added in 1681 to house a great bell. We couldn’t go in via the main entrance, as tourists like the servants are smuggled into a hidden side entrance to the south. We walked past a colourful herbaceous border to a modern building which processes visitors and houses the inevitable shop. We had booked a timed entry and were given audio guides to help us make sense of the place. Unfortunately this building failed to set the mood as it had pop music blasting away. I cheekily suggested they might be better playing some Jacobean harpsichord music but I don’t think they appreciated the joke. So it was that we set off on our medieval, Tudor and Jacobean experience with the 3 chords of Status Quo’s “Down Down” pounding in our ears. Finally leaving the modern world behind we entered the ancient college, greeted by bowler-hatted attendants.

    We soon stepped into Tom Quad which we had glanced into from the street. It’s the largest quad in all of the University’s colleges and one of the loveliest. Its historical buildings from the 16th and 17th centuries are all in soft, honey coloured stone and form an harmonious whole. Overlooking it all is Wren’s fabulous Tom Tower ( or Thom Tower) and in one corner is a small statue of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey who had had a lot to do with the development of Christ Church

    A wide, stone staircase, beneath a spectacular fan-vaulted ceiling led us up to the Hall, the grandest refectory in Oxford. Long tables decorated with little green lamps were being set for some big, formal meal later in the day. They are surrounded by portraits of monarchs, bishops and past scholars by famous artists such as Gainsborough, Reynolds and Millais. It was fairly quiet when we went in but we kept nervously looking over our shoulders as it’s this hall that was recreated in the studio as Hogwarts’ Great Hall in the Harry Potter movies. Other scenes were filmed in Christchurch and also in Oxford’s New College. I had spotted that some companies specialise in ( expensive) Harry Potter tours where fans of J K Rowling’s boy wizard can pose for selfies waving wands or wearing the famous long, woollen scarf. Diehard fans half believe they are visiting Hogwarts, not Oxford University. Surprisingly, the university seems to be pushing this connection. The audio guide brought up Harry Potter before it even mentioned Cardinal Wolsey!

    We enjoyed our visit to Christchurch and it was a highlight of the holiday. We got invited by one of the bowler hats into a very old library not usually open to the public. It had an exhibition about Cardinal Wolsey to celebrate 500 years of the college’s birth in its present form. After ascending a curving staircase with a delicate wrought iron banister, we entered a beautiful, peaceful room with antique furniture and an ornate ceiling. In the exhibition we saw Wolsey’s red cardinal’s hat and his exquisitely illustrated 16th century prayer book given to him by a representative of the Pope, plus a collection of fascinating old documents from the 16th century.

    We eventually made it into Christ Church’s college chapel, also known as Oxford Cathedral. It has a mixture of styles but has lots to admire and think about. In one area there is another stunning ceiling and a medieval -style triptych above the altar. There are windows with medieval stained glass dating back to 1320. There is also a replica of a shrine to St Frideswide which many pilgrims used to visit. Her original tomb and shrine was destroyed in 1530 during the Reformation. Frideswide was a Saxon princess and abbess who supposedly performed miracles and who founded the original church on this spot in the 7th century. Behind the shrine is a ravishing stained glass window by the Pre-Raphaelite artist, Edward Burne -Jones, which tells the story of the revered saint. It shows her being pursued by a rejected suitor. In the end, according to legend, the suitor was struck blind by a lightning bolt sent by God. Bizarrely this picture of life in Anglo Saxon times includes a depiction of a modern, flushing toilet. It’s thought to be something to do with Burne-Jones’s industrialist sponsor. There are 4 wonderful stained glass windows by Burne-Jones in the Cathedral. He is one of my favourite artists with his exquisite depictions of idealised beauty. It was a great finale to our visit to Christchurch and there was not a wizard’s hat, long scarf or wand in sight, thank goodness.

    We wound down by having a stroll along the banks of the River Cherwell. It is separated from the city and university buildings by meadows and playing fields. The river was lined with colourful house boats. Small flocks of Canada and Greylag geese swam around or flew, honking overhead. We saw a few rowers and a couple of punts. We walked through to the Botanical gardens and Magdalen college where the Cherwell has its confluence with the River Thames. We ate wraps at a middle eastern cafe before returning to our base and thankfully finding that the broken boiler had at last been replaced. We enjoyed our hot showers as we looked back on a very satisfying day.

    OTHER COLLEGES.

    Oxford University was founded in the reign of Henry I, the so called “scholar king”. He was the 4th son of William the Conqueror. It is the oldest university in the English speaking world dating back to 1096. It is only beaten for age by Fez In Morocco( 8th century) and Bologna, Italy in 1088AD. It has 38 colleges, most of them set up by wealthy bishops who wanted to promote learning but also ensure their own immortality. We visited Merton College ( 1264) which featured 3 peaceful quads, an impressive chapel and an exotic Fellows garden. We almost had it to ourselves.We also saw some of Oxford’s famous gargoyles — grotesgue , carved water spouts up on the roofs.

    Later in the week we visited New College which is actually very old of course. ( 1379) We were now also back on the Harry Potter trail and we had to detour past fans taking selfies in the quad. The college’s atmospheric, long corridors, great arched windows and cloisters combine to form the illusion of a magical boarding school. It’s a film director’s dream. New College has a large, plain Front Quad which leads to a lovely colourful garden, partly bordered by the original Oxford city wall dating back to the middle ages.

    New College had a lovely historical refectory or hall and a stunning, Perpendicular chapel with rows and rows of stone saints and apostles behind the altar. It was like looking at the west front of Lincoln or Wells cathedral. I think it is an immaculate Victorian replica of a medieval cathedral entrance by Gilbert- Scott. It contains over 50 figures and its technical term is a reredos. The chapel also features a striking, hammer-beam ceiling. It was commandeered for a location in a Harry Potter film , and after having it almost to ourselves for a few minutes, we were invaded by Potter fans all furiously snapping selfies on their phones.

    New College chapel also features outstanding medieval stained glass windows from the 14th century and an 18th century window designed by the artist, Sir Joshua Reynolds. It includes a nativity scene and apparently, according to the blurb that I read, it features the famous artist himself as one of the shepherds, wearing a bright orange robe. I told one of the guides this and he didn’t know — presumably because it has nothing to do with any of J K Rowling’s creations. What a shame that her fantasy world seems to have taken precedence over real art and history.

    CULTURE VULTURES. — The ASHMOLEAN AND PITT RIVERS MUSEUMS.

    An essential ingredient of Ian and I’s city breaks is to chase down culture whenever possible. As well as architecture and history, this usually involves visiting galleries and museums. Thus it was no surprise that, when in Oxford, we prioritised a visit to the Ashmolean Museum. It looks like a huge Greek -style temple. It has thousands of exhibits spread across 4 large floors. It’s second only to the British Museum in importance. Artefacts from all over the ancient world are displayed along with an excellent collection of paintings on the top 2 levels. The floors are connected by a lift or by a grand staircase. Imagine the British Museum and the National gallery rolled into one and you will have an idea of what the Ashmolean is like. It’s technically free and there is no pressure to donate but we gladly paid the recommended figure of £5. Considering the treasure trove of art and history within, this has to be one of the bargains of the century.

    The Ashmolean is huge and can easily overwhelm the visitor both physically and mentally. So we made a plan — looks at the superb ancient Egyptian collection, have a rest over a coffee, then go and view the paintings, and in particular, the 19th and early 20th century works. After depositing our bags in a locker we made our way down a long gallery of ancient Greek statues and busts to get to the Egyptian rooms. We then split up, on the understanding that we would meet in the cafe . I quickly got absorbed in the Ancient Egyptian collection. They had whole carved tombs and shrines as well as grave goods, wall paintings, stone carvings, statues, mummies and painted mummy cases from all eras. It is fascinating and the explanations are very clear and interesting.

    I then went to the cafe and texted Ian expecting him to follow me quite soon as I had taken my time. However he never turned up and didn’t answer my texts, so I drank my coffee alone, feeling a little worried. Afterall, I selfishly surmised, he had the key to the locker where my rucksack was stored! All the best plans of mice and men…. Not to worry –we eventually met amongst the Italian Renaissance pictures on floor 3. Ian had been absorbed by the art and artefacts from the eastern Mediterranean civilisations especially those of the Ancient Greek Cyclades islands. It was a good thing to happen as he had been drawn in and been intellectually stimulated instead of just ticking items off from a list. We looked at the paintings together. We particularly enjoyed the Impressionists and post Impressionists and the Pre-Raphaelites, although I know they are not everyone’s cup of tea. They had some big hitters in there such as Pissarro, Manet, Van Gogh, Samuel Palmer, Turner and Corot. I particularly liked an exquisitely painted wardrobe by Burne Jones which he gave to William and Jane Morris as a wedding present. It’s not everyday you get to see an exquisitely painted Arts and Crafts wardrobe. In fact it was a unique experience for me.

    After all that culture and information overload, we wound down in the tranquil courtyards of Merton College and then enjoyed Mexican veggie burritos at a fast food food joint. We munched away and sat out a sharp shower.

    Later in the week we visited the incredible Pitt Rivers ethnological museum. It’s in a Victorian quarter opposite Keble College which is decorated with different coloured bricks in geometric patterns. Pitt Rivers is situated at the back of the Natural History Museum which is housed in a splendid building similar to its close relative in South Kensington. It is all curving cast iron and glass and dominated by the skeletons of two huge dinosaurs including a fearsome T Rex.

    Entering Pitt Rivers is like plunging into an amazing Victorian time warp. I agree with my guide book’s description of it as “an exotic junk shop.” It’s the main place emblazoned on my memory from previous Oxford trips. Crammed cabinets display artefacts from all over the globe, covering all aspects of human life. They include: religion, music, food, clothes, transport, jewellery, weapons, writing, masks, headgear etc — the list goes on and on. Its set out in a large atrium with the 2 upper floors looking down on the displays below. The ground floor is dominated by native American totem poles. Cases around display African fetishes, model boats, religious deities, shell and bone jewellery, gruesome masks and even mummified crocodiles. It’s in fact impossible to describe everything. This treasure trove or stolen horde ( take your choice) was brought back to Britain by explorers such as Captain Cook and ethnologists and archaeologists such as the man himself — Augustus Pitt Rivers. The latter’s 22,000 collection of objects was eventually donated to the University of Oxford and forms the core of the present display bearing his name.

    Of course this incredible cornucopia of treasures is not without its controversies. It’s very much like the arguments over the Elgin Marbles and the Benin Bronzes in the British Museum. Many say these precious objects were stolen , using British military might ,and should be returned. Until recently the Pitt Rivers museum displayed shrunken heads from Ecuador, trophy heads from south Asia and the ancient Egyptian mummy of a child. These were removed in 2020 on the orders of the museum’s ethical committee as it was thought wrong to continue to display human remains . They are to be kept in storage until the countries of origin are contacted and a returns arrangement negotiated. It’s a thorny, sensitive issue and a notice about it all is displayed prominently in the museum today.

    Anyway, what we did see was more than enough to keep us absorbed and excited for a couple of hours. Amongst the highlights are cabinets where one can pull open multiple drawers to see what surprises are inside. In one drawer I discovered little religious icons from the Orthodox church. They were all individually labelled in neat, precise handwriting. The next drawer I slid open contained tiny pieces of jewellery from around the world.

    Ian and I found the whole experience so stimulating that we were forced to flop into seats outside the museum and consume coffee and cake from a conveniently situated refreshment van. Luckily the sun was shining.

    TOWN AND GOWN.

    For much of our visit to Oxford, we concentrated on the areas dominated by the university. However, Oxford is also a workaday town or city. Beyond Magdalen college, going east up the busy Cowley Road is where the car workers lived and worked. At the other end of the High Street, to the west of the Carfax Tower, there is a sudden transition from gown to town, from academia to normal life. Thus within a minute or two of Christ Church College is Westgate Shopping Centre, a typical mall containing all the usual suspects. Typically the area is packed with everyday shoppers rather than tourists. The train station is up there as well. Near the end of our stay we decided to have a complete change and have a stroll up the Oxford Canal. It’s just beyond the shopping mall and Oxford castle which is now nothing more than a mound adjoining a luxury hotel, and a cluster of shops, bars and restaurants. The canal is picturesque and peaceful. Parallel to it runs an old mill stream. Ducks and moorhens potter about and colourful barges are moored up on the canal banks. It was a lovely walk. We had been told about it by a friend who went to Oxford University back in the day.

    We strolled for about 20 minutes to a bridge, which we crossed to enter a bohemian, former working class area of terraced houses, some of them painted in pastel colours. The area is known as Jericho because it used to sit just outside the city walls. It is dominated by a large brick church with a tall tower like a Venetian campanile. The area seemed to have a strong community spirit with everyone greeting each other on first name terms. It was a bit like walking into a southern version of Hebden Bridge in West Yorkshire. It seemed to have the same vibrant arts scene, independent shops and sense of togetherness. It even has the lovely canal side location. We liked the atmosphere of the place. Ominously though, we spotted a couple of “Save Our Jericho” signs. Maybe the developers are threatening to move in!

    It was our last night and we ate at a very nice Lebanese restaurant in Jericho. It’s opposite a synagogue and I’m sure one of the waiters was an orthodox Jewish boy. Maybe Mr Netanyahu should go there to learn some lessons about peaceful co-existence and cooperation, rather than death and destruction.

    It had been an excellent visit to Oxford. Over 7 days we had seen so much and even fitted in 2 interesting trips out of the city to Blenheim Palace and the Cotswold town of Burford. ( Maybe the subjects of a future blog.) The next day we had our last stroll around the central sights and along the river. Then it was back on to the trains home. We got stuck in Birmingham for a while, but that’s another story. “We are sorry that your journey will take longer than planned.

    NB To read my old blogs please go to : https://scrapheapstuart2.wordpress.com

  • Welcome to WordPress! This is your first post. Edit or delete it to take the first step in your blogging journey. Hello, my name is Stuart. I am a retired teacher now in my mid 70s, god help me. I live on the north east coast of England. I have been blogging on wordpress.com for over 15 years under the site address: scrapheapstuart2 I got the idea for the name because the wife of one of my friends, cruelly described retired people as being on the scrapheap.

    I enjoyed my writing about travel and current affairs. I also did quite a lot of memoir writing. I built up a small following and got some kind, positive comments. However a few weeks ago, wordpress suddenly locked me out. It said my password was incorrect. I went through the forgotten password routine but every new password I chose was deemed incorrect by the algorithm. In the middle of trying to sort out this problem, wordpress bizarrely changed my user name from scrapheaptuart2 to joyfuldonutf881a2b165-kitwe.wordpress.com It was obviously generate by artificial intelligence. I tried and tried to change it back and get into my blogging site but failed. Apparently you only get help from an actual human being if you have a paid plan with wordpress.com I was on the free plan, paid for by adverts that they put into my posts.

    So I gave in and went with the joyfuldonut name. So it looks like I have just started as I have only written one blog so far under that name. It’s one of the frustrations of the internet and modern technology. Maybe I should write a blog about it while in the “grumpy old man” mood. In the meantime my first blog under the new name is about a city break in Oxford. If you go on to read it, I hope you enjoy it.

    This link will go to my ScrapheapStuart2 webpage.